The unavoidable expulsion of the third coach of Brazil’s Bisil’s Bisili National Football side in 15 months has revived the argument of old, nation-division. Whether or not a foreign coach is to be appointed, an laxity that has submerged them to recurring tragedies on the global stage, and now also shaken them to the continental dice.
This subject is emotional as religion and politics in the country, perhaps even more because sports is the biggest integrated force in the country. Foreign coaches Geelotes argue about the country’s quality coaches (in their own leagues and other places). The famous of them is Ronaldo. “I know I will get a flex because I am getting ‘inconsistent’ and I like foreigners. This is not. We have to do the best work.” His long -term strike partner is Riveldo, waving placards for domesticly raised coaches. “Celeco is ours and is to be managed by someone who has Brazilian blood that is running through his veins.”
Nothing probably catches Brazilian football’s illusion and self-destructive romance compared to his resistance to appoint a foreign manager with his long time. This symbolizes both their pride and pride, as much as his doubt, the same insecurity of another colonial attack that can ruin the soul of their football culture. A national team, after all, is the reflection of every element of that culture: good and bad, strength and weaknesses. It is not that a non-Brazilian coach is a completely foreign concept in the country. Uruguayan Ramon Platero (four games in 1925), Joreka of Portugal (two friends against Uruguay in the 1940s) and Filpo Nunez (an exhibition game in 1965) have been managed to all.
But after emerging as a powerhouse in the 1950s, he had no one in the World Cup, and there was no one, which is in the form of a country that symbolizes beauty in beautiful sports. For decades, they remained resistant to the temptation of European football philosophy, it should be for football or ticking taka. When Johann Croff’s total football players were swept away in the football garden, Tele Santana formed the most beautiful team to never lift the World Cup. He borrowed the strategy-and sometimes in the shrinking world, also exchanged some of his. But the emphasis was that the football was described as a “joy, dance and a true party as a true party to play on the way to Brazil-it was separated in a world where strategic systems serve the highest rule when the note-perfect orchestra inspired them to take away the hidden faces.
Joao Gomes, after the loss of Brazil to Brazil, went to Joao Gomes after the loss of Brazil to qualify at the World Cup 2026 at the Monumental Stadium at Buenus Aires. (AP photo)
The time has come for a long time to break its gaze towards Europe to break the past and hiring its next coach. Such an incident had been knocking on the doors for years. The superiority of the success of European coaches for Brazil counterparts was clearly placed by difficult facts that since winning the World Cup in 2002, Brazil has crashed on quarter-finals in four out of five versions on the quarter-finals, or as they met elite European opponents.
The necklace exposed a deep mistake. Brazil may be the highest exporter of footballers for the top five leagues in Europe, its talent can be immense, even its contemporary repetition has more quality and star power than most other national teams, but the country does not churn quality coaches as they do players. This is a cruel contradiction, but one is that Brazil’s football must accept to revive their days of pride.
Historically, the Brazilian coach-producing country has not been there. Unlike his terrible rivals Argentina, the culture that honored Caesar Louis Menony, Marcello Bielasa, Alejandro Sabela and Carlos Billado, new wave of Diego Shimon, Mauricio PoChetino, Lionel Scaloni and Nesteringo. Seven of the 16 part countries in last year’s Copa had an argentina on their hull. Comparatively, only a handful of Brazilians managed teams in the top five leagues of Europe. Most of them, there is no need to say, was a mistaken time. One of the most famous, Luiz Felip Scolari, who was the last Brazilian coach to win the World Cup, was a humble time with Chelsea in the 2008-09 season. In 2005, as Vandeley Luxembourgo in Real Madrid, it was barely to last a season.
The story continues below this advertisement
It is a little surprising that most clubs in the country’s top league have also demanded services of foreign coaches. Last season, six of the top 10 clubs on the table, including the first two, were played by either Argentina or Portuguese coaches. In the last three sessions, the league champions were managed by non-Brazilians.
Among the more successful people were Dorival and their predecessor Fernando Dinizs. Both were seen badly low internationally. Diniz supported a free-flowing brand, but his band looked dissatisfied and disputed. Dorival promised more stability, but one of them looked at the shelter of talent at its disposal to produce a consistent song.
A casual scan of their resumes cheats the lack of stripes to handle the most decorated country in the game. In the last 22 sessions, he has managed 26 teams; The related figures of dinys are 17 in 13. According to a study at the Mexican Journal L Economista, a coach lasts in Brazil for only 15 league days. According to data collected from 2000 to 2022, the boss lasts up to 42 in Spain. This reflects the ridiculous impatience of the major clubs of the country, with their decency, short -term and incompatibility requires a manager for that time to form a team or shape a consistent philosophy. In order to survive in such an environment, coaches also become over-rigging, restless and forever.
Clubs cannot be changed. Naturally, the great coach emerging from the country would be a hurdle compared to the ideal, although the man of former Chelsea and Atletic Madrid Felip Louis is putting a strong case as an exception. Thus, immediate fix, Europe is to embrace, as in Europe, for the first gold and football treasures. Any laxity can see the breakdown of the heart and recurrence of tragedies.