President Pedro Castillo hinted in recent days that there would be an alleged collusion between the Judiciary and the Public Ministry to destabilize his government. What do you think?
Each power has to act according to its competences. The Prosecutor’s Office is responsible for investigating and in a constitutional state of law, no one is exempt from control, not the highest authority of the State, nor the congressmen, nor the magistrates. The Judiciary must also act according to its powers.
At one point there was controversy as to why the desire to want to investigate the president if he enjoys immunity…
We all, especially public officials, have to be transparent. That’s where the control bodies come in. The Prosecutor’s Office in the first instance, the Judiciary is the second…
The president questioned the judge who ordered the preliminary arrest of his sister-in-law Yennifer Paredes. He indicated that there were interests behind it on the part of the Judiciary.
I understand that it is part of the defense of the president. Question judicial or fiscal decisions, but in each instance there are mechanisms. If you do not agree with a court decision, you must appeal. There is no institutional framework to follow a judicial process. There, each judge acts according to his judicial independence and his attributions or faculties. As the president of the Judiciary, Elba Barrios, once said, she is not the chief of all the magistrates, not even I am the chief of the magistrates. Each one has independence from him and I am sure that his actions are limited to his faculties.
How do you rate the actions of the magistrates who carry out corruption processes at the national level?
It is a delicate, arduous and often misunderstood function. We have a national chamber in Lima that is in charge of these processes and we also have special bodies.
On the other hand, the Court of Arequipa, won for the second time the judicial production marathon at the national level. What does this mean for the entity?
These are very important achievements for the Superior Court of Arequipa and also at the national level. It is the second time, the first time was in May of last year where we also came in first place. This time we have increased 43% compared to last year because we have served more than 59,000 procedural records.
This speaks well of the commitment of the workers of the Court of Justice. How many have participated?
It is an answer that we are committed to justice. It is a joint effort of all court workers. There are 147 jurisdictional bodies and we have all contributed to the procedural discharge.
Where is the greatest procedural burden concentrated?
Undoubtedly, they are cases of alimony, followed, unfortunately, by cases of family violence or violence against women. In all family courts we have 62,482 alimony cases pending, but this marathon has helped us close a good number.
The use of applications has also facilitated the attention of processes. What are the applications available to people?
The use of these applications is good because it is the modernization of justice, in one of its stages. We have applications at the national level, for example, El Juez Te Escucha that allows us to connect in real time with the judge to warn them of any deficiency in the process or the meaning of judicial decisions to create transparency and make the decision. Another application that we have is Know your Judge that allows us to know the production of each judge. ❖