John Juaristi: Realism

0
6



I’m going to, fresh from the oven of Random House, a fantastic version of Rodrigo Cortés’ ‘Verbolario’, a compilation of precise and essential definitions of two thousand five hundred days on ABC, which from now on, I think, will become a sort of this Informal Dictionary of the House and its Corridors. I search for the word ‘liberalism’ and I find only one meaning: “at its best, responsible citizenship”. I go back to ‘Sivismo’, and I see that it has two: «Hard monitoring of self./2. Fear of deportation”. Don’t think it’s Joy of the Huerta or anything like that: responsibility, alertness, fear. Is this liberalism? Well, yes sir, that’s all, because normal life doesn’t allow you to feed on holy delusions and, if the benevolent treaty fails, at least you’ll be exiled. Liberalism must be responsible, cautious and fearful, because the social animal is treacherous and murderous, as shown in liberal systems, whether democracy or republic is desired. See Iran, see Russia. In other words, that liberalism, apart from all that has been said, is, sadly, just as Carlo Gambacia wanted it to be: tragic and realistic. In this sense, it is important to consider that liberal democracies should respond to Putin’s mobilization of bounties and threats to use their nuclear weapons against the West, which are no longer hidden. If we truly love freedom, our governments’ response to such threats must be guided not only by fear, but also by responsibility and caution, but, above all, by removing it from a morbid lack of conviction. Will, which, according to Yeats, reinforces the best in modernity, while the worst is transferred – or in Russia – mobilized with fervent intensity. For this purpose, it would be convenient to review some of our classics. For example, Kant’s Eternal Peace. We will get an accurate explanation of why the cause that Russia claims to defend is related to the unjust order. In Appendix II, Kant argues that acts concerning the rights of other men are unjust if their defense does not stand up to propaganda. This is when a larger state argues that a smaller state has divided or split it in two. Kant argues that the war of the large against the small would be unjust if it provoked an alliance of other small states against the ambition of the larger one or other great powers who would try to attract the smaller rebellious state, if not, the smaller rebels. State. The propaganda that Putin has campaigned for his motives to attack and attack Ukraine since February 24 poses a clear nuclear threat against those of us, whether we like it or not, in the face of the unjust and criminal Ukraine’s allies are pack Russian aggression. Today, the threat from Putin is the whole of Western Ukraine.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here